In recent years, a new version of an old lifestyle has gained popularity across social media: the “tradwife,” short for traditional wife. Videos often show women cooking meals from scratch, caring for children, maintaining their homes, and embracing more traditional relationships with their husbands. For some women, this lifestyle represents a rejection of modern pressures and a return to family-centered living. However, its growing popularity raises an interesting question: is the tradwife movement simply women exercising their freedom to choose, or does it risk bringing back expectations that generations of women fought to escape?
There is absolutely nothing wrong with a woman wanting to stay home, raise children, cook for her family, or financially depend on her husband. Feminism should not mean replacing one expectation with another. Women spent generations fighting against being told that they had to remain in the home; telling women today that they must pursue careers would simply create a different restriction. If a woman genuinely finds happiness in being a homemaker, feminism should protect her ability to make that decision.
The problem, in my opinion, is not the lifestyle. It is the message that can sometimes accompany it.
Parts of the tradwife movement go beyond celebrating one woman’s personal choices and begin presenting traditional gender roles as the way women are naturally supposed to live. The distinction is incredibly important. There is a major difference between saying, “I am happiest staying home with my children,” and saying, “Women are happiest when they stay home with their children.” One celebrates individual freedom; the other creates an expectation for an entire gender.
It is also important to remember why women fought so hard to gain independence in the first place. For much of American history, women had far fewer options in education, employment, finances, and family life. Depending financially on a husband was often not a lifestyle choice; it was simply what society expected and, in many cases, what the law and economy made necessary. Feminism did not fight against motherhood or marriage. It fought against the idea that these should be a woman’s only possible future.
Social media can also make the tradwife lifestyle appear much simpler than it actually is. Beautiful kitchens, homemade bread, perfectly dressed children, and carefully maintained homes can create an idealized version of traditional domestic life. What a short video cannot always show is the vulnerability that can come with complete financial dependence. Leaving the workforce for years can affect a woman’s future earnings, career opportunities, savings, and independence. This does not make staying home a bad decision, but it does mean that the choice deserves to be presented honestly.
This is why I do not believe the tradwife lifestyle itself is necessarily a step backward. Women having the ability to choose the lives that make them happy is exactly what feminism has fought for. A woman should be able to become a CEO, a politician, a doctor, a stay-at-home mother, or some combination of all of them, without being told that she has failed at being a woman.
What concerns me is when personal choice becomes an argument against the freedoms that made that choice possible. A woman can choose financial dependence because previous generations fought for her right to financial independence. She can leave a career because women before her fought for her right to have one. She can publicly advocate traditional gender roles because generations of women fought for women’s voices to be taken seriously in public life.
There is an irony in using freedoms created through feminism to argue that feminism has somehow harmed women.
Ultimately, feminism should not determine what a woman’s life looks like. Feminism fought to give women choices, not to decide which choice they should make. If being a tradwife is one of those choices, then women should be free to make it. But when that lifestyle is presented as the role women should return to, it stops being about choice and begins rebuilding the expectations women spent generations tearing down.
The goal should never be to move women from the kitchen into the workplace or from the workplace back into the kitchen. The goal is for women to decide for themselves where they want to be.
Leave a comment